|
|
Post by aar on Jan 11, 2011 15:12:44 GMT -5
What do you mean?
If someone is putting protection on a pick, you have to stipulate what you're getting if it ends up protected
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 11, 2011 15:19:08 GMT -5
I always assume that you get the next pick.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jan 11, 2011 15:30:13 GMT -5
Yeah, I've never heard of protected picks working like that. happened in UOSLR as well, if you dont designate to me the protection, I will assume there is none, in the NBA its done like that on occasion...protected for a while, then cash considerations |
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Jan 11, 2011 21:58:01 GMT -5
I always assume that you get the next pick. |
|
|
|
Post by Tmacz - UOSL4 Champions on Jan 11, 2011 22:01:47 GMT -5
I always assume that you get the next pick. |
|
|
|
Post by footy on Jan 11, 2011 22:15:01 GMT -5
So what happens to pat/aar if it is a top 5 pick?
|
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Jan 11, 2011 22:41:14 GMT -5
Simple solution: man up and stop protecting your picks. Pussies.
|
|
|
|
Post by LionnsPat04 on Jan 11, 2011 22:56:07 GMT -5
I always assume that you get the next pick. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jan 11, 2011 23:11:43 GMT -5
Trade In
|
|
|
|
Post by footy on Jan 12, 2011 21:49:37 GMT -5
So what happens to pat/aar if it is a top 5 pick? |
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Jan 13, 2011 10:15:41 GMT -5
aar gives him nothing.. which is fucked up but he didnt specify that he would
|
|
Kings
Fired 
Finally a reason!!!
Posts: 2,638
|
Post by Kings on Jan 13, 2011 10:35:11 GMT -5
Shady trade.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 13, 2011 12:36:11 GMT -5
Shady.
|
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Jan 13, 2011 13:15:00 GMT -5
This is some shit I would probably quit over, just absolutely gutless.
|
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Jan 13, 2011 13:15:30 GMT -5
Lol at acting like putting 5 stipulations on picks is common sense, let's just get rid of protected picks all together.
|
|
