|
Post by Grizzlies on Jan 25, 2011 17:27:28 GMT -5
Yeah I was going to ask for a half-decent big man back.
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Jan 25, 2011 17:27:51 GMT -5
I would do Wade and Darko or Wade and Al Jefferson (in which case I'd be adding obviously).
|
|
|
Post by Tmacz - UOSL4 Champions on Jan 25, 2011 17:28:23 GMT -5
like: 363 Darko Milicic C 28 7'0'' 275 C+ D+ D A- B C 190 Alexis Ajinca C 25 7'1'' 240 C+ C- C B- B+ B 523 DeSagana Diop C 30 7'0'' 280 C+ D+ D- A- B B
Get 'er done!
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Jan 25, 2011 17:36:13 GMT -5
I hate expiring guys like Mayo...lol What is he worth? Clearly not max...but someone will offer it probably for some strange reason.
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Jan 25, 2011 17:39:50 GMT -5
whatever, you'll be in the same situation with Wade next year, except Wade will be 32 and Mayo is only 26. the deal will be on the table all year if you change your mind or unless I get Gay first.
|
|
|
Post by footy on Jan 25, 2011 19:12:44 GMT -5
Go on Traves, get gay
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jan 25, 2011 19:23:49 GMT -5
Anyone 27 and over 1 year max is okay Anyone under 27:3 year Min for Max Max 1 year deal starting salary of 7 million Max 2 year deal starting salary of 9 million With Birds you can offer whatever you want
|
|
|
Post by J on Jan 25, 2011 19:40:10 GMT -5
Rule still sucks.
|
|
|
Post by J on Jan 25, 2011 19:40:46 GMT -5
I'm gonna just 1 year max any decent 27 year olds. YEEE!
|
|
|
Post by germs on Jan 26, 2011 0:37:13 GMT -5
Good shit Broph
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Jan 26, 2011 12:23:22 GMT -5
yeah not sure why 1 year max is ok for a 27 year old......are some guys coming off rookie contracts not 27?
|
|
|
Post by J on Jan 26, 2011 17:05:43 GMT -5
yeah not sure why 1 year max is ok for a 27 year old......are some guys coming off rookie contracts not 27? Nah, it makes sense that players can be stolen away in their primes for one year contracts. Doesn't 30 really make more sense, and effectively would end the problem? I don't get the idea for 27 other than Play suggested it.
|
|
|
Post by footy on Jan 26, 2011 17:20:26 GMT -5
yeah not sure why 1 year max is ok for a 27 year old......are some guys coming off rookie contracts not 27? Nah, it makes sense that players can be stolen away in their primes for one year contracts. Doesn't 30 really make more sense, and effectively would end the problem? I don't get the idea for 27 other than Play suggested it. I agree. Gonna be funny watching Roy Hibbert get offered one year max deals for the next 6 years
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Jan 26, 2011 19:01:49 GMT -5
Anyone 29 and over 1 year max is okay
Anyone under 29:3 year Min for Max
Max 1 year deal starting salary of 7 million Max 2 year deal starting salary of 9 million With Birds you can offer whatever you want
|
|
|
Post by Tmacz - UOSL4 Champions on Jan 26, 2011 20:30:28 GMT -5
nice
|
|