Kings
Fired 
Finally a reason!!!
Posts: 2,638
|
Post by Kings on Jan 30, 2011 11:25:17 GMT -5
I like it for the Nets.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tmacz - UOSL4 Champions on Jan 30, 2011 12:49:15 GMT -5
Like it for Mavs even with the top 20 protection
|
|
|
|
Post by germs on Jan 30, 2011 13:21:24 GMT -5
gotta look for that fine print
|
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Jan 30, 2011 13:39:58 GMT -5
2nd time Lukey has done that shit lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Garrett Richards on Jan 30, 2011 14:16:00 GMT -5
traded that shitty center to you knowing he had 40 pot to start LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by Nikolas Terrell on Jan 30, 2011 14:16:09 GMT -5
lol
|
|
|
|
Post by lukeyrid13 on Jan 30, 2011 14:42:11 GMT -5
traded that shitty center to you knowing he had 40 pot to start LOL and u wouldnt? |
|
|
|
Post by Garrett Richards on Jan 30, 2011 14:45:35 GMT -5
you act like i'm bashing you for it. it has nothing to do with this deal. Doing this deal without mentioning the protection to HF is shady though.
|
|
|
|
Post by lukeyrid13 on Jan 30, 2011 14:48:27 GMT -5
if the warriors falls in top 20 he can have my 21 instead. heatflash u want to add that to this trade?
|
|
|
|
Post by Garrett Richards on Jan 30, 2011 14:49:17 GMT -5
damn. good guy. (no sarcasm)
|
|
|
|
Post by lukeyrid13 on Jan 30, 2011 14:49:35 GMT -5
i figured he knew cause of last time. but ya i look like a dick, forgot HF wasn't around for that last week
|
|
|
|
Post by HeatFlash on Jan 30, 2011 14:50:05 GMT -5
I'm fine with the trade, just woulda been niced if you woulda mentioned it smh
|
|
|
|
Post by Garrett Richards on Jan 30, 2011 14:50:37 GMT -5
maybe if you would have been active in your first stint, this wouldn't be an issue douche
j/k
|
|
|
|
Post by HeatFlash on Jan 30, 2011 14:51:24 GMT -5
maybe if you would have been active in your first stint, this wouldn't be an issue douche j/k suck my dick tbh. |
|
|
|
Post by Garrett Richards on Jan 30, 2011 14:52:44 GMT -5
no imvho
|
|
