|
|
Post by footy on Dec 3, 2010 20:50:47 GMT -5
and you only need to sign one player  |
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Dec 3, 2010 21:01:32 GMT -5
I dont really get why this doesnt go through.... CONFUSED
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Dec 3, 2010 21:10:15 GMT -5
I dont really get why this doesnt go through.... CONFUSED Nets voided the deal before the Suns accepted |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Dec 3, 2010 21:10:30 GMT -5
sucky, but, yeah
|
|
|
|
Post by footy on Dec 3, 2010 21:16:15 GMT -5
I dont really get why this doesnt go through.... CONFUSED Nets voided the deal before the Suns accepted So what happens now? |
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Dec 3, 2010 21:23:32 GMT -5
I dont really get why this doesnt go through.... CONFUSED Nets voided the deal before the Suns accepted Isnt the rule that once its posted it cant be backed out on? So if you post and the other person does not agree you can still back out? Thats the kinda thing that theres need to be a firm rule on for future reference. Either way your decision but some clarity on that would be good. |
|
|
|
Post by footy on Dec 3, 2010 21:27:06 GMT -5
Nets voided the deal before the Suns accepted Isnt the rule that once its posted it cant be backed out on? So if you post and the other person does not agree you can still back out? Thats the kinda thing that theres need to be a firm rule on for future reference. Either way your decision but some clarity on that would be good. Its shit, the only reason he backed out was because someone said they didnt like the trade for him...so what..do the deal anyways. He accepted it and posted it. And it was he who offered the 2016 1st up to begin with. |
|
|
|
Post by Tmacz - UOSL4 Champions on Dec 3, 2010 21:28:21 GMT -5
I think this should go through. Similar thing happened in UOSLR with marty.
|
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Dec 3, 2010 21:42:51 GMT -5
i need 100 posts
|
|
James
Fired 
Fired
CLE
Posts: 312
|
Post by James on Dec 3, 2010 21:44:19 GMT -5
Lol, this should go through. Sorry. He has agreed to the trade, it is totally viable however he has realised he hasn't got the better end of the deal and has backed out.
|
|
|
|
Post by lukeyrid13 on Dec 3, 2010 21:51:10 GMT -5
Isnt the rule that once its posted it cant be backed out on? So if you post and the other person does not agree you can still back out? Thats the kinda thing that theres need to be a firm rule on for future reference. Either way your decision but some clarity on that would be good. Its shit, the only reason he backed out was because someone said they didnt like the trade for him...so what..do the deal anyways. He accepted it and posted it. And it was he who offered the 2016 1st up to begin with. Lol i said something before anyone even responded. I dont care about the pick really. |
|
|
|
Post by Tmacz - UOSL4 Champions on Dec 3, 2010 21:53:58 GMT -5
Isnt the rule that once its posted it cant be backed out on? So if you post and the other person does not agree you can still back out? Thats the kinda thing that theres need to be a firm rule on for future reference. Either way your decision but some clarity on that would be good. Its shit, the only reason he backed out was because someone said they didnt like the trade for him...so what..do the deal anyways. He accepted it and posted it. And it was he who offered the 2016 1st up to begin with. Na, he posted to void before anyone said it was one-sided. Also it doesn't matter what anybody says over pm. They could say accept over PM and that means nothing here. But I do agree this should go through because he was the one who posted it. You don't need much more than that to let it go through. |
|
|
|
Post by Tmacz - UOSL4 Champions on Dec 3, 2010 21:55:27 GMT -5
Finally some controversy BTW. I've been waiting for something like this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Garrett Richards on Dec 3, 2010 22:03:32 GMT -5
lol @ letting idiots back out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Outlawz on Dec 3, 2010 22:27:01 GMT -5
Finally some controversy BTW. I've been waiting for something like this. LOL |
|
