Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2011 12:50:56 GMT -5
Thought they aren't supposed to go with him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tmacz - UOSL4 Champions on May 13, 2011 12:52:28 GMT -5
Neither do I... but then again, I was looking at your 19-15 record #WINNING Failing to check injury list = LOSING |
|
|
|
Post by bigblufan2 on May 13, 2011 13:08:34 GMT -5
Yea, Play told Marty he didn't have birds. Would be kind of messed up to give Patterson birds after he deals him. He could have gotten better value if he was able to say Patterson had birds prior to this deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on May 13, 2011 13:09:35 GMT -5
Yea, Play told Marty he didn't have birds. Would be kind of messed up to give Patterson birds after he deals him. He could have gotten better value if he was able to say Patterson had birds prior to this deal. |
|
|
|
Post by aar on May 13, 2011 13:10:17 GMT -5
He advertises birds in the PP block, so I'd like the birds to be added if, as Broph says, they're supposed to be there.
If Marty wants to void the deal, he can.
I can get good value from Black from any GM
|
|
|
|
Post by Krudy Tomjanovich on May 13, 2011 13:10:33 GMT -5
I miss Patterson
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 13, 2011 13:14:10 GMT -5
Yeah, I was told that he had birds - why doesn't he? got deleted when he was removed from the Rockets, not hard to edit back in, just pm Play Play said no or else I wouldn't have traded Patterson |
|
|
|
Post by aar on May 13, 2011 13:19:42 GMT -5
got deleted when he was removed from the Rockets, not hard to edit back in, just pm Play Play said no or else I wouldn't have traded Patterson So let's void the deal I'm cool with that |
|
|
|
Post by aar on May 13, 2011 13:22:39 GMT -5
If he's supposed to have birds, then they should be added and you should get to keep him if you don't want to make this deal
I'm being serious
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 13, 2011 13:23:05 GMT -5
or we can just keep this deal and he doesn't add birds?
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on May 13, 2011 13:23:44 GMT -5
"Any player lost to Hard Cap penalties will take his existing contract with him"
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on May 13, 2011 13:24:11 GMT -5
or we can just keep this deal and he doesn't add birds? Would prefer that this gets cleared up and that we abide by the waiver rules Either that or the waivers rules need to be changed |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 13, 2011 13:27:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by aar on May 13, 2011 13:32:41 GMT -5
Was just going by what Broph said
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2011 13:44:24 GMT -5
Dude, it was pretty clear he doesn't have birds. Even in the player block for him it was made clear. There's no reason at all for him to have birds after this trade.
|
|
