|
|
Post by Spencer on May 26, 2011 2:02:04 GMT -5
Warriors trade...
Dionte Christmas
GST 25 1st
GST 26 1st (Top 8 protected)
Celtics trade...
Donatas Montiejunas
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 26, 2011 2:14:29 GMT -5
Give up quite a bit, but I like Don alot. MORE BLOCKS YEE!
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on May 26, 2011 2:35:32 GMT -5
damn thats a hell of a lot...you need rebounding
|
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on May 26, 2011 10:38:55 GMT -5
lol why does Donatas make that much? he is an MLE player if he goes to fa
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 26, 2011 10:46:36 GMT -5
lol why does Donatas make that much? he is an MLE player if he goes to fa Nah. Not with 4 blocks. |
|
|
|
Post by Nikolas Terrell on May 26, 2011 11:30:41 GMT -5
Is it a given that I get 27 1st unprotected if the 26 protection comes into play? JW
I accept
|
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on May 26, 2011 11:52:48 GMT -5
lol why does Donatas make that much? he is an MLE player if he goes to fa Nah. Not with 4 blocks. they don't show stats in the FA list. |
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on May 26, 2011 11:53:16 GMT -5
so few teams have cap these days, ain't no one looking to drop major cash on guys like him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 26, 2011 11:55:03 GMT -5
Is it a given that I get 27 1st unprotected if the 26 protection comes into play? JW I accept Id rather do it continuous. |
|
|
|
Post by Nikolas Terrell on May 26, 2011 11:58:29 GMT -5
I think something as wack as continuous should have definitely been specified before hand
|
|
|
|
Post by Nikolas Terrell on May 26, 2011 12:03:22 GMT -5
And since we're on the subject. How will this work if you just keep on trading 1sts? Am I just never going to land one?
Same with regular protection even. Assuming the 26 protection comes into play, could you just trade off the 27 or is there a rule against that
This is why I hate dealing with protected shit. Usually if someone mentions a protection I'm out of the deal asap but I'm willing to bend since Donatas sucks and has cost me many playoff wins
|
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on May 26, 2011 12:04:10 GMT -5
Agreed on protections being super fucking gay
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on May 26, 2011 12:04:42 GMT -5
SO FUCKIN GAY
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 26, 2011 12:05:17 GMT -5
I think something as wack as continuous should have definitely been specified before hand agreed Spencer posted nothing about it being continous. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on May 27, 2011 12:44:40 GMT -5
lold. 27 can be unprotected.
Lets get angry.
|
|
