|
Post by J on Dec 9, 2010 17:26:04 GMT -5
My proposal is a team can use no more than 3 RC's per season. Teams would be allowed to accumulate up to 4 RC's per season, with only 1 rolling over to the next season. That way there is still an incentive to post, but it cuts down on the spamming a bit.
This is gonna get killed, but I feel like I should try before I give up all hope. It won't effect most of the league, just the people who non-nonsensically spam. Because really, there is no reason not to when it will make your team better.
|
|
Kings
Fired
Finally a reason!!!
Posts: 2,638
|
Post by Kings on Dec 9, 2010 17:39:13 GMT -5
I like it.
|
|
Kings
Fired
Finally a reason!!!
Posts: 2,638
|
Post by Kings on Dec 9, 2010 17:39:31 GMT -5
Seems like other do to.
|
|
|
Post by Garrett Richards on Dec 9, 2010 17:45:02 GMT -5
I think we need to focus more on the guys on the other side of the spectrum.
|
|
|
Post by Garrett Richards on Dec 9, 2010 17:48:17 GMT -5
I honestly don't care tbh.
Just take out the extra 1.4k posts i have and i'll use that energy to get like a +15 via articles.
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 9, 2010 17:52:44 GMT -5
Only if accumulating RCs is unlimited. That is, I want to post as much as I want when I can. If I post 1000 times 1 season, I dont want to lose an RC. I want everything to carry over.
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Dec 9, 2010 17:56:15 GMT -5
I don't get why people are concerned about this shit, players are going to get +9 one way or another, how fast it happens is irrelevant. We shouldn't discourage people from posting. +9's on players are not going to ruin the league.
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Dec 9, 2010 17:56:44 GMT -5
The spammers aren't really getting that much of an advantage, really.
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Dec 9, 2010 18:00:46 GMT -5
Yeah but the spamming is annoying and irrelevant. It makes people not bother reading threads because you just know it's going to be full of complete horseshit.
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Dec 9, 2010 18:01:22 GMT -5
I mean, what the fuck is the point of posting if nobody's going to read threads?
|
|
Kings
Fired
Finally a reason!!!
Posts: 2,638
|
Post by Kings on Dec 9, 2010 18:03:01 GMT -5
To get RC's.
|
|
|
Post by Stupid Fucking Bitch on Dec 9, 2010 18:03:11 GMT -5
There's enough to talk about to where you don't have to spam and piss people off. Hell, we have a word association thread. But whatever, not concerning enough for me to care.
|
|
|
Post by Garrett Richards on Dec 9, 2010 18:03:38 GMT -5
Crack down on the quality then. LOL @ cracking down on the amount. This rule is useless if everyone spams for 600 posts.
|
|
Kings
Fired
Finally a reason!!!
Posts: 2,638
|
Post by Kings on Dec 9, 2010 18:04:50 GMT -5
I thought you didn't care.
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on Dec 9, 2010 18:05:13 GMT -5
There's enough to talk about to where you don't have to spam and piss people off. Hell, we have a word association thread. Over there now ehehe
|
|