|
|
Post by Biggie on Nov 26, 2010 15:53:23 GMT -5
Thunder send:
- First Rounder (#16)
- Fifth Rounder (#132)
Biggie sends:
- Second Rounder (#50)
- Third Rounder (#67)
I accept. I now have #9 and #16 and then I don't pick until #108, #115 and #132. Hopefully this works out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Nov 26, 2010 15:58:53 GMT -5
I like it. I was going to trade out of the 1st round if I was out of the top 10. Nobody else was offering a 3rd rounder so this was a no brainer. Four picks in the first 3 rounds should give me a good foundation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stupid Fucking Bitch on Nov 26, 2010 17:31:19 GMT -5
Damn, Biggie is going to have a great 1-2. Then again, think this draft will run deeper than most people think and OKC will be able to get 4 good starters out of their 2 2nds and 2 3rds.
|
|
|
|
Post by lightningstrike on Nov 26, 2010 17:47:47 GMT -5
I can see the logic either way.
|
|
James
Fired 
Fired
CLE
Posts: 312
|
Post by James on Nov 26, 2010 18:07:49 GMT -5
Like this for Biggie. Can still get a very very very valuable player at 17 whom will be worth more than those two picks after the draft.
|
|
|
|
Post by Biggie on Nov 26, 2010 18:13:34 GMT -5
Like this for Biggie. Can still get a very very very valuable player at 17 whom will be worth more than those two picks after the draft. But I do have to wait 101 picks until my third player comes up. But ill have three close picks after those 101 are up, so its cool beans I guess. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 26, 2010 18:24:24 GMT -5
if you go this method, you almost have to trade some picks to move back into the second or third round
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 26, 2010 18:25:14 GMT -5
Like this for Biggie. Can still get a very very very valuable player at 17 whom will be worth more than those two picks after the draft. If Erbes is planning on starting off with a rebuild, this isnt bad, he can probably get some solid youngsters |
|
|
|
Post by Stupid Fucking Bitch on Nov 26, 2010 18:35:35 GMT -5
I don't think he has to start with a rebuild, honestly. 2 2nds and 2 3rds can produce a very formidable starting lineup. Like I said earlier, this thing is deeper than most think.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 26, 2010 18:37:35 GMT -5
yeah, but I think his plan is to go with young players with his picks
|
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Nov 26, 2010 18:46:59 GMT -5
yeah, but I think his plan is to go with young players with his picks Yep! |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 26, 2010 23:43:22 GMT -5
Trade in
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 27, 2010 0:16:22 GMT -5
I can see the logic either way. |
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 28, 2010 14:06:35 GMT -5
|
|
