|
Post by play on Jan 20, 2011 13:02:47 GMT -5
Featured Players Jereme Richmond SF 6'7'' 235 21 B C C- B+ B- A Michael Gilchrist SF 6'7'' 190 20 A- C C- B C A
The Rest Jalen Kendrick SF 6'7'' 200 21 B+ C- B+ C+ C C Tony Mitchell SF 6'8'' 216 22 B C+ C- B C B Roscoe Smith SF 6'8'' 210 21 C+ B- C B- C C Cameron Clark SF 6'7'' 180 22 C B- D B C+ B Casey Prather SF 6'6'' 190 22 B- C C+ A- C+ C J.J. Moore SF 6'7'' 210 22 B- C+ C- C C B Justin Coleman SF 6'5'' 190 21 B- C D C+ C- C Travis Mckie SF 6'7'' 190 22 C B+ C- B+ C C Alex Rossi SF 6'6'' 180 23 C A- D+ C D C Anthony Brown SF 6'7'' 210 22 C+ C+ C- B- C C Jason Morris SF 6'8'' 225 24 C+ C D+ C+ C C
|
|
|
Post by Erbes on Jan 20, 2011 14:51:27 GMT -5
Gil! YEEEEE
|
|
|
Post by footy on Jan 20, 2011 16:54:05 GMT -5
RICHMOND!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Tmacz - UOSL4 Champions on Jan 20, 2011 16:56:15 GMT -5
Hopefully this draft is top-heavy so Kru doesn't get that good of a pick from me.
|
|
|
Post by Garrett Richards on Jan 20, 2011 17:54:05 GMT -5
too bad i can't tank good enough.
|
|
|
Post by GAME on Jan 20, 2011 17:56:35 GMT -5
too bad i can't tank good enough. me too
|
|
|
Post by GAME on Jan 20, 2011 17:58:04 GMT -5
I just jizzed in my pants Gil I have 3 chances Magic/Clipps/Mavs not looking good only if I super tank
|
|
|
Post by GAME on Jan 20, 2011 18:03:41 GMT -5
Give us more Play u dam tease
|
|
|
Post by Tmacz - UOSL4 Champions on Jan 20, 2011 18:04:51 GMT -5
Gilchrist would be perfect on my team. holy moly
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Jan 20, 2011 18:15:22 GMT -5
Not a fan of these players, it really depends how low that C on Gil is tho
|
|
|
Post by lukeyrid13 on Jan 20, 2011 18:28:52 GMT -5
Not a fan of these players, it really depends how low that C on Gil is tho yeah not nearly as impressive as the first three years. The last 3 sf classes have been really good with Barton Barnes Leslie McAdoo etc but these guys aren't as good as them IMO
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Jan 20, 2011 19:14:44 GMT -5
We need a few weaker classes though the last one was absurd.
|
|
|
Post by Biggie on Jan 20, 2011 22:30:58 GMT -5
I think id rather take Richmond. But Gilchrist probably has the higher potential.
|
|
|
Post by germs on Jan 20, 2011 23:56:50 GMT -5
too bad i can't tank good enough. me too 3rd'd
|
|
|
Post by germs on Jan 20, 2011 23:57:33 GMT -5
For the love of god, this class better have a nice SG prospect
|
|