|
Post by Grizzlies on Nov 24, 2010 14:34:51 GMT -5
I wasn't around for the IT system but it looked pretty cool.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 14:35:04 GMT -5
Maybe go back to the old IT system? I dunno. problem I had with that is teams could get nothing for their posting, a team who skated by by 1 post on the limit would get more points ......hrm, may have just had an idea though
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 14:36:03 GMT -5
sending a second player for IT as a reward for posting would be nice
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 24, 2010 14:42:23 GMT -5
Nah you don't want two players getting IT'd... you'd end up with rating inflation if you're not careful.
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 24, 2010 14:43:17 GMT -5
I don't mind post rewards as long as it's not just spam. Like I used to go through box scores and summarise what happens in a big post. I'm not doing shit like that if the whole post is worth as much as one copy and paste of a stat line.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 14:44:15 GMT -5
Nah you don't want two players getting IT'd... you'd end up with rating inflation if you're not careful. the same limits would be in place as before, 3 per player, but, yeah, two a year would be excessive, I really like the BBS system to be honest
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 14:44:55 GMT -5
I don't mind post rewards as long as it's not just spam. Like I used to go through box scores and summarise what happens in a big post. I'm not doing shit like that if the whole post is worth as much as one copy and paste of a stat line. I loved those posts, I just have no way of knowing how to reward that....it would take reading every post.....not fun
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 24, 2010 14:45:22 GMT -5
Yeah the BBS system works well... but that's BBS. Why offer two leagues that are pretty much the same?
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 24, 2010 14:46:56 GMT -5
I don't mind post rewards as long as it's not just spam. Like I used to go through box scores and summarise what happens in a big post. I'm not doing shit like that if the whole post is worth as much as one copy and paste of a stat line. I loved those posts, I just have no way of knowing how to reward that....it would take reading every post.....not fun No I know that. Maybe get a moderator to see who is active and not active based on not just posts but generally what you see from them? I've always done big summaries in sim leagues... in every one I've been in. I stopped in UOSLR as soon as spamming was being rewarded.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 14:52:10 GMT -5
I loved those posts, I just have no way of knowing how to reward that....it would take reading every post.....not fun No I know that. Maybe get a moderator to see who is active and not active based on not just posts but generally what you see from them? I've always done big summaries in sim leagues... in every one I've been in. I stopped in UOSLR as soon as spamming was being rewarded. ehh, thats tough to, cause then I would have constant arguments if somebody was"not active"
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 24, 2010 14:55:15 GMT -5
Meh, you be the judge of activity? Low activity gets a warning PM to pick it up, if it doesn't get better, strike 1 - you take away their IT for the season. 3 strikes and you're outta the league.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 14:57:23 GMT -5
I would like articles to be the primary source of a teams improving players...
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 24, 2010 14:58:22 GMT -5
Well articles are articles. Separate. You write the article, get the votes, get the points, as per usual. Capped at say 2-3 times per player per career of course.
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Nov 24, 2010 14:58:28 GMT -5
I like +2 for every 200 posts, no more than twice to each cat (I like the +4 to a category opposed to +3), no more than 5 overall. 2 articles, that = potential +20 overall.
then maybe +2 rewards classified as RCs for winnings, predictions, etc.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 15:01:04 GMT -5
so far I have two peoples input...
|
|