|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 14:10:17 GMT -5
Should we go with the current BBS method which is no repeat categories, a +3 for 200 posts and three RC's per player no limits to how many in a season
or, should we go with the SLR method
+3-5 for 300-500 posts two RC's per player, one RC per player per season
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 14:11:23 GMT -5
Also, post any different ideas you may have, I will guarantee one thing, we will not be moving to a cash system at all
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Nov 24, 2010 14:14:01 GMT -5
I like BBS' style because it encourages short term activity too. I would prefer maybe +2 for every 200 posts no more than twice in each category and no more than 4 or 5 in a career.
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Nov 24, 2010 14:17:14 GMT -5
Combined articles and upgrades I don't think a player should be able to get more than +20'd.
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 24, 2010 14:24:27 GMT -5
Yeah if you want to limit league inflation, you want to limit the amount of upgrades. I honestly don't like the UOSLR system. I think spamming is silly. If one person does a big long post in the sim thread with game summaries, and another person just posts "stfu" and then "gtfo", the second person gets twice as much credit.
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 24, 2010 14:25:49 GMT -5
And it really did end up like that when the new system was introduced. Posting for the sake of posting and not really having much to say. It ended up being impossible for people to actually read posts that were being made, especially in the sim thread. You'd wake up and there'd be like 10 pages to get through, yet all of it was spam... then you just ended up not reading shit.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 14:26:37 GMT -5
And it really did end up like that when the new system was introduced. Posting for the sake of posting and not really having much to say. It ended up being impossible for people to actually read posts that were being made, especially in the sim thread. You'd wake up and there'd be like 10 pages to get through, yet all of it was spam... then you just ended up not reading shit. so what would you suggest
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Nov 24, 2010 14:27:42 GMT -5
give some rewards for team accomplishments (50/60 wins, ecf/wcf/ title, etc)
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 14:30:56 GMT -5
Best overall record, and Team to win the title deserve something
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 24, 2010 14:31:07 GMT -5
give some rewards for team accomplishments (50/60 wins, ecf/wcf/ title, etc) It's pretty hard to track, but I actually like this sorta thing. Actually rewards you for having a good team. Also champions should get a champions hard cap which is like the normal one +5mil or something like that. Champions in leagues don't get shit.
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Nov 24, 2010 14:32:01 GMT -5
Champions hard cap is gay/unrealistic.
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 24, 2010 14:32:45 GMT -5
Maybe go back to the old IT system? I dunno.
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 24, 2010 14:33:23 GMT -5
Champions hard cap is gay/unrealistic. Meh, I think if you're the champs you should get extra leeway to retain talent etc, and owners would be willing to give that extra flexibility to do so.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 14:34:00 GMT -5
sorry Tiger, but not going to give a Champions Hard cap, I fear that would result in a lotta teams risking going over the HC for that champs HC. I want teams to fear the HC.
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Nov 24, 2010 14:34:19 GMT -5
I hate people being able to sit on teams for extended periods of time. I am guilty of it, but I still hate it.
|
|