|
|
Post by kobe24 on May 12, 2011 12:09:22 GMT -5
Tripp should be avg. around 9 and 11 or 12 rpg by the end of the season. Hopefully yall dont think he will keep up 14 rpg.. He is a good player I just don't think he will be great and I feel like NPL will. thats the risk i take tho
|
|
|
|
Post by bigblufan2 on May 12, 2011 12:09:26 GMT -5
(2) 1sts, and (2) ACs + Tripp to make up the difference between NPL and Jakstas, seems like a bit much.
And I know you got Loving in the deal too, but he's garbage.
|
|
|
|
Post by MeanJoe on May 12, 2011 12:09:59 GMT -5
i dont think i should have to give up the ACs but he said broph told him to I didn't say Broph told him to. Play mentioned it would be better with Tripp to have ACs in him. |
|
|
|
Post by Tmacz - UOSL4 Champions on May 12, 2011 12:10:01 GMT -5
(2) 1sts, and (2) ACs + Tripp to make up the difference between NPL and Jakstas, seems like a bit much. And I know you got Loving in the deal too, but he's garbage. IMO Mavs should have been adding to a base deal of Tripp + Jakstas for Louis |
|
|
|
Post by bigblufan2 on May 12, 2011 12:10:04 GMT -5
Tripp should be avg. around 9 and 11 or 12 rpg by the end of the season. Hopefully yall dont think he will keep up 14 rpg.. He is a good player I just don't think he will be great and I feel like NPL will. thats the risk i take tho I understand this thinking, but you didn't just trade Tripp for NPL. You added a TON to him. |
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on May 12, 2011 12:09:39 GMT -5
yea i definitely feel like the ACs were a bit much, but he was being stubborn about it because broph had told him to. But I dont really mind them and the firsts arent a big deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on May 12, 2011 12:11:27 GMT -5
it all depends on how each player develops so we shall see
|
|
|
|
Post by bigblufan2 on May 12, 2011 12:14:28 GMT -5
it all depends on how each player develops so we shall see This offseason will decide how this deal pans out for both. |
|
|
|
Post by play on May 12, 2011 12:16:30 GMT -5
it all depends on how each player develops so we shall see This offseason will decide how this deal pans out for both. |
|
|
|
Post by aar on May 12, 2011 12:18:48 GMT -5
Lakers get the 1st overall pick from last year's draft
He had a bad first TC, but if he has solid upside, he'll be way better than the guys he moved for him
|
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on May 12, 2011 12:22:09 GMT -5
it's pretty obvious that NPL will pan out, Kobe's already written an article so he'll probably get AC's in on him, which is key really.
|
|
|
|
Post by play on May 12, 2011 12:26:44 GMT -5
Lakers get the 1st overall pick from last year's draft He had a bad first TC, but if he has solid upside, he'll be way better than the guys he moved for him Really? 561 Rolandas Jakstas SF 18 6'8'' 181 B- B C+ C C A 535 Nate Pierre-Louis SG 19 6'8'' 185 B B C+ C C A they are not that far off rating wise....Jakstas had a +4 first TC. |
|
|
|
Post by play on May 12, 2011 12:28:27 GMT -5
it's pretty obvious that NPL will pan out, Kobe's already written an article so he'll probably get AC's in on him, which is key really. AC's are very key. I don't think a lot of GM's understand that. |
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on May 12, 2011 12:30:13 GMT -5
The +24 at our disposal is something a lot of people don't take advantage of.
|
|
|
|
Post by LionnsPat04 on May 12, 2011 12:39:59 GMT -5
I feel like Dallas rapes here. Big time |
|
