|
Post by Boo Radley on Jun 6, 2011 10:53:03 GMT -5
Change the goddamn article voting rules. It's ridiculous that articles have 13 or 14 votes for days on end and it's clear that the article is going to get a 5. I see it as a big put off to people writing articles and it's generally just a pain in the ass for the author to go back and continually bump it waiting for some inactive GM's to click a button a few times.
|
|
|
Post by kobe24 on Jun 6, 2011 10:58:26 GMT -5
Change the goddamn article voting rules. It's ridiculous that articles have 13 or 14 votes for days on end and it's clear that the article is going to get a 5. I see it as a big put off to people writing articles and it's generally just a pain in the ass for the author to go back and continually bump it waiting for some inactive GM's to click a button a few times.
|
|
|
Post by germs on Jun 6, 2011 11:21:48 GMT -5
To me, it should be if an article gets 8 in one cat. (over 50% of 15)
|
|
|
Post by MeanJoe on Jun 6, 2011 13:10:07 GMT -5
To me, it should be if an article gets 8 in one cat. (over 50% of 15) x2. If they get 8 votes in one category then there is no way for it to get less than what the 8 votes were in.
|
|
|
Post by play on Jun 6, 2011 16:43:32 GMT -5
while im commish...8 votes in one category will get you the AC.
so this is fine by me.
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Jun 6, 2011 17:04:51 GMT -5
To me, it should be if an article gets 8 in one cat. (over 50% of 15) this has always been my stance as well. I understand that waiting for 15 kind of increases activity/participation, but at the same time, it just isn't practical.
|
|
|
Post by germs on Jun 6, 2011 22:29:40 GMT -5
thanks Play
|
|
|
Post by MeanJoe on Jun 7, 2011 8:38:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Jun 7, 2011 9:03:01 GMT -5
|
|