|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 22:41:17 GMT -5
Just a thought, but, I could go with an IT system, then, use posts as a scouting service type deal, 200 posts gets you a players rating in XXX though, Potential would not be allowed. You would be limited to 3 a year, and you would be allowed to focus them on draft players, giving tanking teams more to post for
|
|
|
Post by Grizzlies on Nov 24, 2010 22:58:18 GMT -5
xxx=1 rating or 3?
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 24, 2010 23:29:08 GMT -5
|
|
Kings
Fired
Finally a reason!!!
Posts: 2,638
|
Post by Kings on Nov 24, 2010 23:37:33 GMT -5
Don't really like it.
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 25, 2010 3:52:24 GMT -5
Previously in NBN Will would come up withan "unknown" draftee who just had scouting reports throughout the year, but no ratings were released until draft day. You could incorporate something like that into it. Certain posts give you advanced scouting privileges where you get to see either a rating, or test one of your players against him to see who is better in certain attributes. Something only say lotto teams can do and if they have enough qualifying posts.
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Nov 25, 2010 10:27:40 GMT -5
I have always been a fan of players with catches. Like they have a buyout, or they can't come over for so many years. Things like that help keep things interesting.
|
|
|
Post by patdarock on Nov 25, 2010 11:01:59 GMT -5
If it were more rewarding, it'd be a good idea. Say the amount of post you get each season would determine how many players you get to scout. and 1 category really isn't that much of a reward. Say if you got 200 post you could get 1 or 2(depending on which one you choose would determine how the scale goes) prospects for 3 categories, and 400 for 3 or 4, and 600 for 5 or 6. So therefor the most active people can reap the rewards for being active. It will also encourage more activity although there would need to be some sort of crack down on spamming. Just what I think tbh
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 25, 2010 11:49:28 GMT -5
To be honest I like something like that as a reward for posting rather than upgrading ratings. It stops league inflation, but still encourages people to post and they get inside information on the mysterious draftees.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 25, 2010 14:13:29 GMT -5
I have always been a fan of players with catches. Like they have a buyout, or they can't come over for so many years. Things like that help keep things interesting. I think I may do that with Rubio, just in the fantasy draft
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Nov 26, 2010 1:29:42 GMT -5
DOnt even understand the question.
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Nov 26, 2010 1:59:58 GMT -5
DOnt even understand the question. I proposed going with a scouting system as a reward for posting, for 200 posts you could scout a players rating at something, like inside handles etc., with the old IT system from SLR as the RC type deal, but, it looks like there is no support...
|
|
|
Post by footy on Dec 1, 2010 4:54:45 GMT -5
To be honest I like something like that as a reward for posting rather than upgrading ratings. It stops league inflation, but still encourages people to post and they get inside information on the mysterious draftees. Agreed. Would rather see RCs used for Scouting Players rather than increasing skills. Its got my support Broph
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Dec 2, 2010 22:37:26 GMT -5
I think Id need a more organized and specific plan to really put my 2 cents in.
|
|